Systematic reviews are foundational to evidence-based practice, but the reproducibility and auditability of study identification and selection remain persistent challenges. Existing reporting ...
An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will evaluate the current standards for high-quality systematic reviews for comparative effectiveness research and ...
Scientists say they have used artificial intelligence (AI) to reproduce 12 systematic reviews in two days — slashing the time it takes to produce these ‘gold-standard’ studies, which bring together ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results